Meme thingie
Nov. 5th, 2004 12:56 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
woodfaceSo I saw this politics meme that's out there and tried it for fun.
Sex between consenting adults should be:
Legal and left alone
Regulated by community standards
You mean sex? The entire bloody thing? I'm dead set against restricting anything between genders but now you mean the whole bloody thing? What are they gonna do? Make you request to have sex a month beforehand so they can send an observer to your bedroom and make sure no body part is going where it should not go? Talk about sexual frustration.
Marijuana should be: legal etc
You know, I don't like drugs and I am pretty much against it except for medical reasons. My country has legalised the possession for personal usage though.
Replacing government welfare with church and private charities
*blinks* Isn't welfare something the government HAS to provide? Is it not their responsibility to take care of their citizens? But you know, I really am too little informed to understand exactly how the whole thing works in Belgium.
Who would you trust the most?
A politican you voted for
A CEO of a company you like
Your minister / pastor / priest
Trust with what? I trust a politican (well not trust trust) to take care of politics, I trust a minister to take care of the spiritual health (if you chose to let them anyway) and I'm not sure what the company is doing in there. When it comes to saving my life? I'll trust a doctor. Dude, what kind of question is this?
Abortion is:
Wrong
A woman's choice
*sighs* Who are we to chose for anyone else? If someone is raped, I believe it is their right to end the pregnancy. If someone can not carry a baby because it would harm her, they have a right to end it. If someone knows they do not have the means to care for their child (be it whatever reason) they have a right. Whether or not I agree with their reasons does not matter here. That is for every woman to decide for herself.
Are you for or against school vouchers?
Against, they make things worse for underprivlidged students
For, because every parent should be allowed to chose a religious school instead of public schools
Not sure... you like the idea of competition - but not goverment paying for private or religious schools.
I'm not entirely sure what school vouchers are. Someone? I do know that Belgium had a crisis around religious and public schools. We have a division now. I have gone to catholic schools all my life, our government does not support these schools (or they do but not as much as the public schools). I believe that religious schools have a right to not teach moral classes besides religion classes. I believe that if you send your child to such a school, you have to follow the school's guidelines and you have no right to whine. Besides that, I believe that public schools should not have any involvement with religion. If they want to give religious classes and moral classes, then they should make classes available for all religions.
But above all, I think our government should strive for the best education possible. I don't believe in dumbing things down. If catholic schools in Belgium provide a better education than public schools, it should be the public schools who should heighten their standards. It should not mean that catholic schools have to be pushed to give moral classes so some rich people who don't want to have anything to do with religion can have their way.
You Are a New School Democrat |
 You like partying and politics - and are likely to be young and affluent. You're less religious, traditional, and uptight than most Democrats. Smoking pot, homosexuality, and gambling are all okay in your book. You prefer that the government help people take care of themselves. |
Sex between consenting adults should be:
Legal and left alone
Regulated by community standards
You mean sex? The entire bloody thing? I'm dead set against restricting anything between genders but now you mean the whole bloody thing? What are they gonna do? Make you request to have sex a month beforehand so they can send an observer to your bedroom and make sure no body part is going where it should not go? Talk about sexual frustration.
Marijuana should be: legal etc
You know, I don't like drugs and I am pretty much against it except for medical reasons. My country has legalised the possession for personal usage though.
Replacing government welfare with church and private charities
*blinks* Isn't welfare something the government HAS to provide? Is it not their responsibility to take care of their citizens? But you know, I really am too little informed to understand exactly how the whole thing works in Belgium.
Who would you trust the most?
A politican you voted for
A CEO of a company you like
Your minister / pastor / priest
Trust with what? I trust a politican (well not trust trust) to take care of politics, I trust a minister to take care of the spiritual health (if you chose to let them anyway) and I'm not sure what the company is doing in there. When it comes to saving my life? I'll trust a doctor. Dude, what kind of question is this?
Abortion is:
Wrong
A woman's choice
*sighs* Who are we to chose for anyone else? If someone is raped, I believe it is their right to end the pregnancy. If someone can not carry a baby because it would harm her, they have a right to end it. If someone knows they do not have the means to care for their child (be it whatever reason) they have a right. Whether or not I agree with their reasons does not matter here. That is for every woman to decide for herself.
Are you for or against school vouchers?
Against, they make things worse for underprivlidged students
For, because every parent should be allowed to chose a religious school instead of public schools
Not sure... you like the idea of competition - but not goverment paying for private or religious schools.
I'm not entirely sure what school vouchers are. Someone? I do know that Belgium had a crisis around religious and public schools. We have a division now. I have gone to catholic schools all my life, our government does not support these schools (or they do but not as much as the public schools). I believe that religious schools have a right to not teach moral classes besides religion classes. I believe that if you send your child to such a school, you have to follow the school's guidelines and you have no right to whine. Besides that, I believe that public schools should not have any involvement with religion. If they want to give religious classes and moral classes, then they should make classes available for all religions.
But above all, I think our government should strive for the best education possible. I don't believe in dumbing things down. If catholic schools in Belgium provide a better education than public schools, it should be the public schools who should heighten their standards. It should not mean that catholic schools have to be pushed to give moral classes so some rich people who don't want to have anything to do with religion can have their way.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 01:55 pm (UTC)The government must offer its citizens free or as cheap as possible educations. I don't think it's their task to get involved in any religion at all so if you want your child to go to another school, you should pay for it.
Our universities have always been very democratic too. No matter what school you went to, what your grades are or what direction you followed, you can go to university. Although this costs more money, there are scholarships for children coming from a family that gains below a certain amount of money. (This system isn't perfect but it does work) Sadly enough the restructering of our universities (in the image of English and American uni's) will be a set back. It will make education more expensive and it will be a step back instead of forward.