Thesis annoyance
Aug. 5th, 2004 02:10 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
woodfaceSo in every chapter I have been using 6 sources: Physiologus, Aberdeen bestiary, Bartholomaeus Anglicus, Albertus Magnus, Brunetto Latini and Jacob van Maerlant. I have made an introduction to introduce them all. And now in the umptieth chapter I hand in with those sources he says that if it's the first time I mention these people I should situate and introduce them.
Okay, please tell me how I should take his corrections seriously if he can't even remember anything of this? No wonder he started suddenly commenting on putting chronology in my chapters while the whole damn thing is already chronological. I understand that he has had a lot of people to follow up on their thesis and he has had exams in between that too. But seriously, this is the damn structure and basis of my thesis and he can't remember it! Yeah, I'm very grateful I have another prof reading this as well.
Okay, please tell me how I should take his corrections seriously if he can't even remember anything of this? No wonder he started suddenly commenting on putting chronology in my chapters while the whole damn thing is already chronological. I understand that he has had a lot of people to follow up on their thesis and he has had exams in between that too. But seriously, this is the damn structure and basis of my thesis and he can't remember it! Yeah, I'm very grateful I have another prof reading this as well.
