Letter from a reader in the paper

[woodface]

The headdress is discriminatory towards men. It implies that the mere sight of a pluck of hair, a knee, or any bare skin of a woman will drive the man crazy. It's saying that men are controlled by their hormones instead of their reason and are incapable of controlling their sexdrive. Isn't that discriminating? Isn't that implying that men hasn't evolved over the centuries and is still driven by an animal instinct that determines their behaviour completely?

So all men should rise up to this injustice and prove that they are more than just a bunch of hormones!